The NEW Illustrated Guide to Mendacity and Folly in the 21st Century.
Posted on | July 1, 2013 | No CommentsJustice Antonin Scalia has been known for use of “original intent” arguments in his decisions on the Supreme Court. Recently, he thrilled linguistic historians by his stunning use of the term “Argle-Bargle” in his dissent while discussing the merits of the opposing decision in the DOMA case. We asked Justice Scalia how he always seemed confident that he knew the intent of the Founders, even on issues that had not even arisen in 1787.
“Why, that’s simple. I use a OUIJA Board.”
“Justice Scalia–you, a Catholic, using a Ouija Board? Isn’t that rather paradoxical?”
“Why not at all, even the Pope comes to me for advice. Well, he did, until this Latino guy–imagine, the Catholic Church looking out for the poor and disadvantaged … it’s un-Christian!”
“But still–I’d always heard that use of oracles was rather heterodox.”
“Well, it might be,” Scalia allowed, “if I actually believed in it. But I usually push the planchet around to the answer I want anyway, so it doesn’t count.”
“Are you the only sitting justice who uses a method like this?”
“The only one who uses a Ouija Board. Justice Thomas doesn’t have to–he’s the re-incarnation of an 18th century Capuchin monk.”
“Is that why he’s always so quiet on the bench?”
“Yup,” said Nino. “Vow of silence. He’ll be a great wife now that we have to get gay-married.”